Ciarán’s commentary.

 

Dear Reader. I am well aware that some of what follows will not find universal agreement. It may even cause offence, and if I cause true offence I am truly contrite. Freedom of speech is valuable to me; my voice is one of the few things I've got left- not self-pity but boundless pride. I know too well that history teaches that when freedom of speech  is not frequently used it falls into abeyance and can be surreptitiously taken away. Do not get me wrong: I'm not a loud-mouth. I just like to think that when I want to say something or express my opinions that I can do se free of the fear of retaliation or victimisation. Most of the time though, I'm far happier relaxing with a beer and a good book. So I say to those so easily offended, especially those lice and other pond-life who inhabit this whispering marsh which is Co. Cavan: have the decency not to make abusive 'phone and threatening calls to me (or send offensive e-mail messages, now that they have recruited  someone who thinks he can write to their miserable little cabal). They strut and fret their time upon the stages of their miserable little lives enough as it is. Thankfully, following their brief hours thereupon they will then be heard no more, though their rank odours will probably linger for longer.

 

Loopy Luka does it again

That neurotic gobshite President Alyaksandr Lukashenka has once againLuka decided to show off his imbecility. This time the target of his lunacy is western degenerate pop music. He has ordered all of the country's radio stations to play less non-Belarussian pop music. In fact, it's not to form more than 25 per cent of station output. Any station that doesn't toe the line will be shut down. This move has caused considerable annoyance amongst local disc jockeys. Yauhen Mirov of Spunk FM in Minsk explained the dilemma. "This means that 75 per cent of our music broadcasts have to be sourced locally. The problem is that its difficult to get hold of stuff that people want to listen to. An awful lot of it is just plain shit." He added: "There are some really good local bands but they're all on the president's blacklist." President Lukashenka has some long-standing ambitions of becoming a pop idol and regularly entertains visitors to his house by playing tunes on his accordion. It is rumoured that he plans to release an album with an Irish group called Foster and Allen, and that the tracks will be laid down in a recording stuidio close to the border with Northern Ireland at Castleblayney, This will occur during the president's forthcoming visit to receive a cheque from the Irish branch of the "We Love Luka" committee as well as life membership of the Cocksuckers of Columbine and a special set of authentic Irish rosary beads made in Taiwan. As an honoured visitor to the Irish border region he will give a number of high-profile interviews to local media outlets, in which he will praise their commitment to maintaining the highest standards in journalism. Security is expected to be tight (and that's not the only thing) when he appears on stage in a one-off gig with Foster and Allen where he is expected to perform a Russian cover-version of their hit: "Once I had a hape o' shite". He has also expressed a desire to appear on the Irish wank-along variety show The Lyrics Board. Having seen videos of the programme he has expressed a near hysterical lust for its presenter Linda Martin, declaring that she is his "type of woman", as well as a determination to bring her back to Belarus where she would be made head of the country's campaign to win the Eurovision song contest.

Box populi, box ...

A recent opinion poll has found that a majority of people in the Irish republic believe that the IRA was not involved in the Northern bank mega-heist. A Elvis.jpg (3396 bytes) similar majority also stated their belief that Elvis is not dead, and that it is not possible to get pregnant after doing it for the first time. The opinion poll also looked at attitudes towards God. It found that Irish people still believe in a God - nearly 90 per cent. However the figure plummetted dramatically when a numnber of key variables were changed. Only 43 % believed that God is a woman, while less then 20% believed that God is black. An overhwelming majority believed that God was a Roman Catholic, but respondents were evenly split on whether God was open to bribery.

My latest toy

I have just received a gift which will bring me much joy and satisfaction - a new wheelchair. For so long I have been unable to walk any distance without developing painful cramp or the associated fear of putting one foot in front of another. For someone like myself who used to enjoy walking this was something of a cross to bear, but I bore it cheerfully - what else could I do? I knew that some relief would come through a wheelchair, but I haven't got one until now for reasons which are nobody's fault - except, perhaps, my own. A wheelchair has a powerful symbolism for many people as an icon of disability. It attracts unwarranted prejudice. I would have got one before this if I had had the courage to ask for one, but I feared that this might have caused upset and distress to my family. I was waiting for someone else to breach the subject, so when my occupational therapist how I would feel about using one I was delighted and my happiness took on a more concrete form when it was delivered. It is such a neat piece of kit which will allow me to savour fresh air again for decent periods as well as enjoying the sensation of movement. I have also had a most wonderful and useful chair-lift installed, as the journey up and down stairs was becoming tiresome. This was fitted and installed by John O'Reilly of Breffni Mobility, a man who is an exemplar of professionalism and hard work.  My heart is warmed by the existence of the many people who in their way are solicitous for my welfare and who try to do their utmost to enhance my quality of life.

Naurally I know there will be some, such as the pestiferous Tim Ford and his informants who will say that the above is yet one more attempt by me to push my disabilities into people's faces and thereby earn their sympathy, and that the whole exercise is a product of my "victim complex". What gives him, a person who has never met me and whose information about me is based on the toxic hearsay of others, the right to pass judgment on me? If he is such an expert on how disabled people feel he might like to swap places. This is impossible of course. But I would have to say that I would not exchange my present state, "cabin'd cribb'd and confin'd" as I am for anything. Far from feeling myself a victim, I believe myself truly privileged. I might be tempted by a new personality as a film star with hordes of horny young women pursuing my every footfall though.

I sometimes regret that I didn't reproduce Tim Ford's miserable little message on my website for all the world to see. He may well be one of the "wolves in sheep's clothing" inhabiting contemporary Cavan, who appear, at a prima facie level, to be so nice and so winning in their ways. My website will have served its purpose if it helps to extract the rats from their holes. One line of his message caused me deep hurt. Like so many it did not constitute a fully-formed sentence - if he is American, as I have heard, there is the defence that many Americans have trouble with sentence construction - just look at their president! The "line" in question was the following (and I quote it in its entirety): ... doctorate?". What did this question-mark betoken? Is this the latest theory of the "wannabe" historians? Let me assure them that there is nothing questionable about my doctorate. The reasons for my sensitivity on this topic have nothing to do with vanity but are very personal, and far too worthy to be mentioned on the same page as anything associated with the base Tim Ford.

But I believe that this Ford individual is a "blow-in" though sadly his informants are not. If I were to believe that the hostility he expressed towards me was shared by a majority of Cavan people I think I'd be tempted to shake off this mortal coil. No I wouldn't! To think that I would undermine this life with which I have been given on trust because of the leprous bleatings of a crowd of semi-literate peasants is absurd - to hell with them! I aspire neither to the hostility nor the adulation of Cavan's people, merely their beneficent ambivalence - and if these words are too big they can look them up in a dictionary.

I am now looking forward to my renewed life of movement. I am a realist - it can never be like it was before the onset of the Multiple Sclerosis, but I will be able to go out again. Of course, mobility will still be restricted. I've only been given a wheelchair, not a helicopter, and I'd need the latter to safely cross some of the roads in my neighbourhood - the result of lamentable planning decisions by local government demi-gods. I will not be going near the Cathedral of SS Patrick and Felim. Apart from visits from the saintly and elderly Fr Mcgovern, the cathedral's clergy have completely ignored me so I wish to return the compliment.

A place in the sun

Most people are aware of the difficulties that Minister for Justice Michael McDowell is having with Roscommon County Council regarding his prospective holiday home there. Most people also know that Mr McDowell is not, by a long stretch, my favourite Irish politician: I am opposed to his doctrinaire beliefs about Irish society and inequality and I have indeed made unfavourable and unflattering comments upon his baldness. But in his dispute with Roscommon County Council and its arrogant chief executive John Tierney, I am four-square behind Mr McDowell.

Mr Tierney is a conceited and supercilious individual who once served as County Engineer in Cavan where he found plenty of submissive weasels prepared to tolerate his insufferable and misplaced hauteur.  I recall how he dismissed the contributions of a county councillor to a meeting as being "mere semantics". I know this because the poor councillor, who in those days was a friend, rang me up to ask what semantics were. (Had I been truly naughty I might have replied that the engineer obviously meant "sementics" - a poncy word for masturbation, adding "he saw through you Pat for the wanker y'are..".) Mr Tierney believed that he was doing a good job in Cavan, although one of the people  to whom he made this 'umble comment begged to disagree. He has continued his boorish and arrogant behaviour elsewhere. But I somehow feel that he has met his match with McDowell.

Not long ago Mr Tierney attempted to steel his position as Ireland's best County Manager by revealing the reception of death threats; it was on all the news channels along with the messages of support and succour he received from others of his ilk. These threats must surely have been from some deranged crank and ought not have caused him much worry. For a start, he, like many a senior figure in Irish local government has long felt that he lives a charmed life and that "no man of woman born" can harm him. Even if a latter-day MacDuff had mustered the courage to shoot him Tierney would have been safe, as the putative assassin’s aim would have been disturbed by the outstretched and grasping hands of others in the crowd, begging: "Hey, let me do it". But let no one say that I am making light of such threats, which must have been very distressing for Tierney and his family. Having been the object of threatening 'phone calls from people with ties to illegal organisations I know how terrifying it is to feel that there are people out there who would like to do you harm.

Mr McDowell is a member of an unlikeable crowd called the Progressive Democrats. I must say, (as a "true" liberal - unlike the timorous beasties who apply the label to themselves in that organisation), that they must be allowed their errors. Yet one has to wonder whether Mr McDowell and his holiday-home’s fate would have been far smoother had he been a member of Fianna Fail? After all, one former Justice Minister who hailed from the county of his future recreation was allowed to emulate the builders and block-layers of early '60s East Berlin in building a wall around his dwelling without any planning permission. Had Franz Kafka lived in the 1980s he might very well have penned a story entitled The Great Wall of Cootehall. The gentleman in question, of course, is no longer an active politician, turning instead to Burn-again [sic] Christianity. He no doubt identifies closely with Rocco il Pagliaccione, but his religious beliefs and restraint cannot be emulated by some of his family and would-be successors to his political mantle. They lament when they have to forego sex for periods as long as ten weeks.

But Mr McDowell is no doubt aware that the area of planning law in Ireland is a long-standing and long-playing joke. These is not a county council in Ireland that does not routinely grant "Planning permission for the retention" of an existing structure, such as a house or building which was built without any planning permission, and probably in defiance of every rule of planning, and which has probably been occupied for years, maybe decades. Mr Tierney is probably aware, as a former county engineer in Cavan, of a house which had been built on a blind corner and which had stood for well over a decade without its owner or builder seeking retention. This example was after all brought to my attention by a member of his staff, but no one can ever say that Tierney was in the least responsible for it. But this is a problem which is widespread throughout Ireland, in far more places than those with which John Tierney may have had any links. It has nothing to do with the payments of bustarelle or bribes. It stems from a culture of bloody-minded arrogance and incompetence common throughout Irish local government, both its executives and its elected members. It is true that some county councils, as well as an Bord Pleanala, have declared some structures as illegal and have suggested that they should be demolished, yet I know of no structure which has fallen victim to bulldozers. In this regard it seems churlish and oppressive for Roscommon County Council to prevent Michael McDowell’s agents from continuing work on his holiday home, or even securing what work has been already carried out. Michael McDowell would not be the man I know him to be were he to let these bureaupaths away with this.

I do feel, however, that Mr McDowell has displayed a guileless attitude here, to such an extent that one wonders about his fitness for ministerial office. Why didn't he just build the house and thumb his nose at the planning regulations - after all they're just for ordinary people. This is what most people in his position would have done. That way he would have avoided all the delays, such as the loss of the initial planning application, the visits by council officials to ascertain whether the requisite notice was visible and hanging at the correct angle, not to mention the inspection by the fire officer. While Mr McDowell has revealed some worrying crypto-fascist tendencies as Minister for Justice he is a man of integrity. Not for him the skulduggery of transferring troublesome and interfering police officers to postings in the arsehole of nowhere or colluding with "foreign" police forces in the interests of family solidarity.

But I suppose Mr Tierney’s actions to date further reflect his blind arrogance. Someone who provokes a hornet’s nest is asking to be stung, while anyone who provokes a senior barrister is certainly either a fool, a madman, or possibly both. But then Michael McDowell, despite what I have to say about him, is a type of lawyer with whom Mr Tierney would have had no contact. After all, he’s a barrister, not one of the small-town backdoor solicitors with their arts degrees and law conversions, who play golf with the big shots and help their golfing buddies keep their bailiwicks in a climate of fear and obsequiousness lest criticisms of their manifest misfeasance and illegalities give rise to vexatious and fictitious law suits. There are some who would love to use the above for such a specious claim. My message to them is short and I hope comprehensible even by them: Come on punk – make my day!

UPDATE!!! On December 20th, Michael McDowell won his appeal against Roscommon County Council, when the High Court found that the latter had "... misconstrued the scope of its functions." In plain words its petty-minded officials had acted as if they were God. We should not perhaps be too severe in our criticisms of Roscommon County Council, for such haughtiness and arrogance is widespread in other county council areas. Much depends on the quality of leadership at the apex. Nice one Micko! It seems that McDowell was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd!

 

Why Did You Believe Me When I Said I Loved You When You Know I’ve Been A Liar All My Life?

Many people will remember the Morecombe and Wise sketch featuring this song, and most would be astounded to believe that there is any link (albeit tenuous) with the dismal science of Economics. Well read on. This year’s Nobel Prize for Economics has gone to Professors Edward Prescott and Finn Kydland for their monumental, though by now a little passé research on macroeconomic cycles. By amassing a truly superlative-defying mass of data they have been able to show a number of very interesting features. For a start, and not really in the league of the revolutionary, they have helped put one more nail into the rotten casket of Keynesian economics. J.M. Keynes was a conceited man: it wasn’t so much that he thought himself the world’s smartest man but that he knew it empirically. His General theory was born out of the wreck of the Great Depression of the 1930s, and his work must be forever associated with lines of cloth-capped (and male) factory hands queuing up at soup kitchens while still-operating factory plants belched out phlegmatic effluvia of black, unhealthy smoke. Not that many of the men in the cloth caps read Keynes with its convoluted and involved style. Keynes worried little about the lack of demand for his thoughts among the working class, but he did think quite a lot about demand in the economic sense. Demand is a human activity, a rational response to the world. So, according to the Keynesian model a country could stoke its way out of recession by introducing demand which would in turn pump up production and with it pull up employment levels. This might lead to high inflation, but Keynes taught that sadly, people could not have their cake in eat it. High inflation meant low unemployment. This neat little nexus fell apart in the 1970s with the era of stagflation – runaway inflation accompanied by sluggish or negative growth and high unemployment.

Prescott and Kydland’s work also examines responses by ordinary to economic information. Economists came to believe in Keynes’ infectious optimism (or pessimism) about human beings – because they were as clever as he was (or maybe because they could never dream of being as clever) they would act in predictable ways to economic information. Such intellectual certainty could be pencilled into economic planning. So a government that cuts taxes on capital and savings in the hope of encouraging prudence by its people - and promises to keep them low - will be popular, but not everyone will believe that the government will be true to its word. They probably suspect that, a few years down the line, the government will not be able to resist the temptation to tax the funds that have been built up. So many people will decide not to be fooled but to act in what would be considered an economically deviant way and blow their money in the here and now. Similarly, if a government pays lip-service to the ideal of low inflation, but don’t have the bottle to stick to the policy, this can lead to high inflation as people sensing official wavering go on spending sprees financed by unrealistic wage demands. The perceived lack of trust in long-term economic policies is due to what Prescott and Kydland refer to as "time consistency problems", and hence the tenuous link with the song.

They’ve also shown that economic and business cycles aren’t really cyclical at all but are influenced by external shocks, such as technological developments and things like oil crises. Isn’t it funny the way economists can "prove" what we’ve known all along? I recall a similar, though not identical proposition being put forward by a Russian economist called Kondratiev, but he never got a Nobel Prize for it. He didn’t even get a permanent headstone over the permafrost of the Stalinist camp where he perished.

Reality

Regular readers of the RTE Guide might have been forgiven for thinkihg that the mag had transmogrified overnight into "Religious Right Review" owing to the placing on the front-cover of that flat-earther Dana. She's really ugly, a personification of a hatchet-face: in fact she makes Linda Martin look kind of ... er... well maybe not. The guide has announced the launch of a new reality show for 2005 called Screwed. Female television and show business personalities will dress up as prostitutes and attempt to persuade punters to have sex with them for money - or Green Shield Stamps. Once the deed is done the John will be offered his money back and invited to fill in a form rating the experience. Naturally his annonimity will be guaranteed, so his bishop, chief whip or CEO need never know. However, the public will be able to vote for its favourite hooker, and to vote off the one who isn't really making the cut, just like the BBC show Strictly Come Off presented by the geriatric Bruce Forsythe Johnson who must be relieved that he's no longer got a mass murderer living beside him.

The Race for the Park

The race to elect our next president has descended into an unseemly scramble. It is no more than a competition for possession of a useless, though highly-polished bauble. Let's face it, the Presidency is a ceremonial position. The framers of that heap of twaddle we call our constitution were influenced by numerous factors when they invented our head-of-state. One was a jealous, bureaucratic desire to ensure that power stayed where it was, and where it belonged, in the hands of the executive. There was perhaps a desire to avoid possible Bonapartist developments, whereby a populist demagogue could concentrate too much potentially disruptive powers in his fist. There was the need to ensure that the chief citizen had respect, but not too much respect, and that his powers and lustre did not clash with the real power-brokers in the land, the Irish catholic hierarchy. But more than anything else, was the unspoken wish to frame our constitution as closely as decency permitted on the British model, the one - possibly the only one - with which the constitution's draughtsmen were familiar.

Let us compare the two heads of state: the English crown and the Irish presidency. The crown sits at the constitutional apex in the United Kingdom, as does our presidency, but executive actions are imbued with the crown's aura. One speaks of the crown instead of the government when the latter acts. The proper name for the legislature is The Queen in Parliament. When a criminal case comes before the court it is cited as The Crown, or Regina, versus the accused. But this is all so much verbal froth. The fact is that the executive has usurped these powers, and it is the executive which wields them. There is such a thing as Royal Prerogative, but one of the most infamous instances of its use was in the early '80s when Queen Margaret employed it to outlaw unions at Britain's GCHQ. In reality the crown is impotent. No law can have force without receiving the royal assent. In theory this could be refused, but a constitutional convention has developed that the monarch assents to every law passed by parliament. The one remaining shred of power that may exist is the potential power to refuse to prorogue or dissolve parliament. Were a Prime Minister to lose the confidence of the House and seek a dissolution, the monarch could refuse such a dissolution were a potential alternative administration available. Not much of a power is it?

Ireland's president can rely on a nice, written constitution instead of a collection of constitutional conventions. But their power isn't much greater. The office does not apply its aura to official acts. These take place in the name of the state. Laws must receive the signature of the president, which is never refused. However (in one of the big differences between Ireland and her sister isle) the president can delay signature if they feel that the legislation may be unconstitutional. In which case it is referred to the Supreme Court who, as the nice pliant little mice that they are, nearly always find that the law is constitutional - the one exception being a School Attendance Bill in the 1940s. Once the court has given the legislation the constitutional thumbs-up there is nothing for the president to do but sign on the dotted line. They also have the power to refuse a request for a dissolution but as this has never been used, its employment would lead the office into such uncharted constitutional waters that it would be unlikely to be ever used. Rather the holder of the office would say: "Ah fuck it, let the cunts fight it out at the polls", though naturally they would employ less coarse language.

So the office of the Irish presidency is ceremonial: whatever powers it has are at best residual. It's a bit like an old man in a wheelchair who can, very occasionally, get an erection but who can't hold onto it - no pun intended - that's exactly the problem: he can't do anything with it.

But I muddy the waters. The office isn't about wheelchairs or erectile dysfunction; it comes with a nice house in the centre of Dublin with no pesky traffic or rolling house development to disturb one's sleep. There's lots of foreign travel with 5 star accommodation - no flea infested B&Bs, or Greasy Spoons. In fact, you never have to put your hand in your pocket, except maybe for a quick game of billiards. All you have to do is keep your mouth and your legs shut, and enjoy the ride.

This is what attracts so many of the would-be hopefuls. Michael D. Higgins has obviously got pissed off with having to deal with the knackers of Galway and the agonising transfers of crank candidates to see whether he'll be returned. The same distaste for the rough-and-tumble probably informs Eamon Ryan's presidential ambitions, though I'm surprised that it wasn't Ciaran Cuffe who had his head up. After all, were he to get ensconced in the Aras he'd have a decent gaff to invite his American relations to. But once elected president you could say goodbye to the clinics, having to listen to the great unwashed whinge about losing their benefits, or the plaint of the mother of twelve whose husband has left her, barefoot and penniless, for a Lesothan limb-dancer.

But what would happen if Dana were to get to the park - stop the bloody lights Bunny. There would no doubt be Prayer Breakfasts, while sections of the building would be renamed The Father Michael Cleary wing, The Father Brendan Smyth Suite and the Matt Talbot Bar, while to please some of her alleged financial backers in the deep south the Papal Cross would be moved to her front lawn and set on fire permanently.

 

The Great Exchange

Economic historians write widely about the Columban Exchange. The process whereby the fauna and flora of the Old and the New World were exchanged and mixed following Christopher Columbus’ rediscovery of the continent. Of course, it is more correct to speak of exchanges. On the level of food the old world and its populace benefited from the introduction of foodstuffs like the potato, maize and tomatoes. At the level of zoology the New World received the horse. There are many other exchanges that may be isolated, but nearly all of them involve an unequal exchange. Yet there is one where a certain equilibrium has been achieved. The arrival of the Europeans in America was catastrophic for its inhabitants. They brought with them European diseases like smallpox that were completely unknown in the New World, and before which the inhabitants were completely defenceless. Consequently millions perished. One of the soldiers who accompanied Cortes on his conquest of Mexico, Bernal Diaz, described how the emperor Montezuma used to smoke a mixture of tree resin and tobacco, served in a decorated pipe after his meals. The recreational use of tobacco leaves was taken up by the Europeans and it spread back to the Old World. Once again nobody is too sure how many people in Europe, and their descendants throughout the world have died of cancer and other diseases brought on by tobacco smoking. It is certainly equal to the number of victims of smallpox. So in this exchange at least, the Old and New Worlds are quits. But the imbalance is possibly not in the Old World’s favour here. Over time many natives of America acquired a tolerance to European diseases. Furthermore vaccinations were introduced which had an admittedly slow impact. Nobody has yet, as far as I know, developed a tolerance against lung cancer.

 

Weeds and grass

Here is a newsflash: a supermarket has been robbed by a lone intruder. Amongst the items stolen are a three-piece suit, 250 packets of cigarettes and ten lettuce. Gardai have asked the public for assistance in catching the robber. They say they are looking for a well-dressed rabbit with a cough.

The Vintners’ and hospitality industry’s hysterical response to Michael Martin’s introduction of a smoking ban once again shows that they are a group of idiots looking up their own back passages for a piece of fluff. They threaten massive job losses in the tourism sector, but it is a wonder we attract any tourists at all when such clowns are at the head of the sector. They have an image of the "average tourist" which is quite alien to reality. He (or occasionally she) is seriously loaded, so rich in fact that they don’t realise when they are being ripped off with poor service, rotten food and bad drink in unhygienic surroundings. They also stagger coughing and spluttering off the ‘planes, maybe smoking two cigarettes. They may just be able to carry the high-calibre rifles and shotguns they are going to use for shooting Irish game i.e. anything that’s Irish and game (it’s an old joke - remember it). They are also incredibly stupid, so they will accept anything green and cheesy as Irish.

If the vintners are so worried about attracting tourists why do they not lobby for the relaxation or complete prorogation of our cannabis laws? Look at the amount of money we could make by opening brown cafes, or brown-green cafes. The stuff is easily grown, and because it generally induces euphoria none of the punters need realise that a lot of the shit really is grass. So the rip-off culture can continue and even grow. Maybe I am being less than serious here, but there is one thing I can never understand. Why is it that cannabis, a drug which is non-addictive, is illegal yet drugs which are not only addictive but seriously deleterious to the health of their consumers, not to mention the distress which their family members must suffer vicariously, are available in every street, of every town, village and hamlet in the country. I can hear some of the vintners already protesting: "It’s what brings tourists to Ireland". In the words of the great Jim Royle "my arse". There are some pubs in Ireland where a toddler would be served alcohol – so long as he wasn’t a member of the Traveling Community.

And let us not forget about the sexual tourism industry. I accept that Cavan (and Roscommon) might not have much pulling power here, though this probably reflects a lack of business imagination, as I’m sure dogs occupy an as yet unexploited niche in the market (Let There Be Love…)

Bad Law

Ireland’s Minister for Justice, Michael McDowell plans to introduce new legislation making it an offence for policemen to pass information to journalists in return for payment. Well, actually, it already is an offence: this new legislation will introduce the possibility of imprisonment for up to 5 years, a heavy fine, and maybe public flagellation through the streets. This has already raised the ire of, well, nearly everybody concerned: the police force themselves, journalists and civil liberties groups.

There is one major lacuna in the issue: there is only, at best, anecdotal evidence to suggest that the practice is going on. No hard and fast proof: nothing that would stand up in court. There is an adage in the legal profession that "Hard Cases make Bad Law". Well, let’s apply this here. "Non existent Cases make Funny Law". Put another way: if it ain’t broken don’t fix it. Jurisprudence contains many schools of thought about what Law is and why it is needed. A utilitarian approach suggests that Law develops in response to identifiable needs and weaknesses in society, which, if not checked, make life difficult for citizens. In the days when the Common Law was developing this happened "on the hoof" so to speak, so offences like homicide and larceny, harmful to both life and property, became offences. With greater legislative self-confidence these offences were refined by statute. In today’s age of deliberation and information gathering, of delegations and proposals, the idea of making law on the hoof is absurd. Just because you think there is something wrong, or rumour has it that an activity is prevalent, is just simply not enough anymore. It is a return to the days when there was legislation against witches; a group whom rumour had it was responsible for a whole spectrum of malfeasance.

I have not seen the legislation; but I don’t know whether "payment" is adequately defined. What is a journalist? In Ireland this embraces many animals, from those who can write to the semi-literate scribblers of the local press. Would I be a journalist? I’ve never been employed by a paper though I once had a press pass. Maybe definitions will be groped towards by the courts. If a journalist decides to offer a police whistle-blower say, a year’s supply of Johnny Walker Black Label or Variety Packs of "His and Hers" condoms, will that be thought of as payment? The courts may seek evidence of a contract and consideration. But any law student knows the difference between executory and executed consideration on the one hand, and past consideration on the other. Consideration must also have value. One fears that Mr. McDowell’s mandarins have not looked into this fully. He and his officials have been carried away by an anti-media hysteria, which affects bureaucrats and bishops. Let’s return to the adage: "Quicky Law Is Bad Law".

Indeed Mr. McDowell seems to allow his bureaucrats to dictate too much government policy. There has always been this danger – a minister who knew all about cows and sheep but not much else was easily made the plaything of civil servants, some of whom had degrees when these were not common. But surely this cannot be the case with a minister like Mr. McDowell, a member of a prominent and long-respected family, a barrister of the first rank. Surely he, if anyone, can be his own man.

Mr. McDowell was a founder member of the Progressive Democrats. In those balmy days he was dedicated to constitutional reform. He was certainly no "feet in the air" radical, but one felt that he had sufficient nous to realise that Departments of Justice and Interior Ministries are targeted the world over for infiltration by shadowy groups with equally shadowy agendas. These groups believe that information is power, so they don’t like to share it.

Michael McDowell stretches credulity in his attempts to defend this law. When asked for proof that such bribery occurs he retorts that he won’t give any, and that he doesn’t need to give any. He hints that this is because of national security. This is no more than arrogant poppycock, and arrogance is the reverse side of the coin of stupidity. He seems to think he’s in another country. His bluster-filled but lame defence reminds me of the GCHQ case in England in the mid 1980s (R. v. Minister for the Civil Service ex parte someone or other…). This centred on the principle of the Royal Prerogative and the exercising thereof by the Lady who thought she was Queen. In the UK royal prerogative is a misnomer. It is really executive prerogative. It does not exist here outside the realm of emergency powers’ legislation as far as I know, unless Minister McDowell is planning to introduce it on the QT. (He was, after all, a well-known fan of The Iron Maiden.) And we don’t have any royalty – no, McDowell, don’t even think of going there.

The proposed sanctions for transgressors seem disproportionately harsh, especially when compared to the punishment meted out to police "whistle-blowers" in the past. For example what happened the policeman who was alleged to have informed the criminals of the precise movements of journalist Veronica Guerin on the day of her murder? Does Minister McDowell believe that Veronica considered she had a "God Given right" to bribe policemen? I think that Veronica Guerin, like all citizens of this so-called liberal so called democracy believed she had a right to enjoy the protection of the police.

When those in positions of authority act like hysterical sows responding to the sound of the bacon factory lorry one can only assume that they’ve got something pretty rotten to hide.

So I’m afraid the Minister could be left with egg on his dolly old eke – might help restore some of his riah.

Wigs on the Green

Most people were no doubt stunned to learn that Ireland’s county councillors, that amorphous band of time wasters, pocketed 25 million euro last year by way of expenses. Considering they do nothing for the population, except attend endless meetings where they talk through their tail ends, and salve the egos of the various local government executives, this figure seems terribly large.

Some individuals creamed off 60k – that’s over a grand a week. Where did the money go? Up the Cook’s arse no doubt. But we have learned some alarming news about the type of "expense" that was covered. One county councillor apparently got the taxpayer to pay a large fine he had incurred, instead of a custodial sentence, for hitting a spectator at a football match. Another bought a fabulously stylish hairpiece to replace his old wig when he became council chairman: he donated the old one – nits and all – to a local museum. A third councillor spent part of his expenses on a very expensive art appreciation crash course. He was urged to do this after he described the paintings in an exhibition he was opening as "a haip o’ shit". He's planning on taking literacy lessons next. It has also been revealed that a number of councillors' expenses cover maintenance payments to sons and daughters, while a vile rumour is doing the rounds that another group of expenses went on bribes to guards and medical personnel in a lunatic asylum to allow one councillor to leave.

One wonders whether the expenses include the payments for presents to the county managers at Christmas. These include bottles of whisky or brandy for himself, as well as boxes of choccies for his wife. Then, as everyone involved in Irish politics knows, you have to stand your round. Do the expenses include buying drink for everyone in the pub – including the guide dogs – at retirement parties for policemen?

I just can’t figure out how anyone doing fuck all can get through this type of loot.

Question: What is the difference between a ham sandwich and a county councillor?

Answer: The average ham sandwich is only half an inch thick. If any of them read my comments (or failing that, have them read for them) they will become thick. Completely inarticulate, vowing vengeance and issuing all sorts of oaths preceded by curses. I remember a Cavan county councillor who said that the state of the county’s roads demanded that the government declare a state of emergency. Good job George W. wasn’t around, or he would have been expected to send a few ships to lie offshore. Cavan has no coastline though, but this didn’t stop one councillor suggesting that a delegation attend a conference on St Brendan the Navigator. But that was in the bad old days before the heroic era of Brian the Brave of Blessed Memory, who filled in all the potholes with his own ordure. Now that he’s gone the councillors are at a loss for someone’s arse to lick.

Compensation Culture

Our Thatcherite minister for loot, Charlie McCreepy has spoken out once again in good, new right style against another evil, insidious enemy. Not communism, not Social Welfare Fraud (that’s coming), but the Compensation Culture.

Well let me say, as a citizen of the Irish Republic, that I’m looking for some compo: compensation for years of mismanageme3nt, years in which our so-called public representatives and public servants have milked the system, feathering their own putrid nests. We all know the example of one west Dublin politician. Not content with his salary as an MP he was involved in a host of dubious property deals. There is also the example of the former assistant County and City manager, who kept bribes in his bathroom – and he was not alone.

All these people were paid to work in the interest of the public, yet they worked in their own self-interest, often against the public interest. Surely the citizens of Ireland deserve compensation for this.

Many (though by no means all) of those who were / are involved in these rackets were members of Mr McCreepy’s own party. If he wants to begin compensating the Irish people he can begin by zipping up his mouth and putting an end to the torrent of insulting, arrogant, holier-than-thou statements. These might cut some ice with the party he should have joined, but hadn’t the balls to.

Maybe Barrow-boy Bertie might like to kick him out – before he kicks Bertie out. That’s what he’s at. If Bertie can’t see it he’s too stupid to be sent around to Burdocks’ for a one-and-one.

But we all have anecdotal evidence of the Compensation Culture. For example there is the story told of this fellow who wanted compensation for injuries he claimed to have suffered in a car crash. He limped and hobbled painfully into the court in Dundalk. But, on being awarded a nice little sum he left the courthouse with the agility and fleetness of a ballet dancer.

Pennies from Heaven

 

Recently the family were doing some spring cleaning, and one of the items they found was a memento of their fateful involvement with the Movement - a Fianna Fail umbrella from the early '80s. I thought that it should be donated to the local museum, but as its administrator is a member of that sad organisation he'd be able to supply such a trophy. But then I remembered that his involvement with that shower is relatively recent, and at the time from which the umbrella dates he was probably an activist in a less constitutional form of activity. These umbrellas were apparently used for the National Collection to stop the money getting wet! Did Frank Dunlop have one? Would he have needed one? After all, the hot money was never in danger of getting wet unless it tried to swim back from offshore.

 

(Now I have a lot to thank the movement for - well one thing in particular. This may be included in my eventual autobiography, but until then I must observe a gagging-order enforced by propriety. I also don't wish to cause the girl embarrasment.)

 

A philosophical Observation on Cavan

 

I have many gifts but one of the greatest is perhaps not placing too much value on money. As long as I have enough to buy a few books and a couple of CDs I am happy. How different it might be if I gave much value to money, for when I look around Cavan and see the way in which money is wasted, how it is used to pay the salaries of useless, crappy individuals who are not fit to wipe the shoes of decent people, I might go mad. 

 

Racism

 

I just cannot understand racists or racism; it's a disease. If I meet someone who had a different skin colour I'm anxious to know where they are from. I am also anxious to make them feel at home. I put myself in the position of a foreigner in a strange land. Apprehensive, possibly fearful. Not knowing who or where to turn.

    Sadly racism is a disease which glimmers under the surface in Ireland, like a rash waiting to break forth into horrible ugly boils on the skin. Many of our senior civil servants are racists, especially those owing their positions to memberships of Catholic lay groups. They are able to prevail upon weak ministers to pass racist legislation. As for politicians, well I am just waiting for the local elections next year. Well, actually I am fearful at the same time. The governing parties may very well attempt to avoid a public backlash for six years of feathering their own shitty nests by playing the race card. One of the so-called opposition parties may very well return to its Fascist routes by trying to outdo them in pandering to the lowest social denominators.

    And finally in the racists' rogues gallery let us not forget our police services. While many police officers are decent hard-working people, there are some who do not rise to the standards of a police force in a democracy.   Like their colleagues in the United Kingdom and the United States they are institutionally racist. A person of non-Caucasian skin type is guilty (of some unspecified misdemeanour) and can never become innocent. Some officers spread malicious rumours about the amount of crime committed by foreigners, and then add that there is then the added hassle of getting them interpreters, instead, no doubt, of just beating the shit out of them. People speaking in foreign tongues inevitably causes unease for some of these officers, as it throws into sharp relief their own lack of learning. They also complain about having to go out to traffic accidents. Apparently it's all the paperwork, and the strain of this on people of limited literacy can be appreciated.

 

I have heard that a local cemetery was recently vandalised. Where were the police? No doubt this was the work of Romanians, or Nigerians... or more than likely nice good law-abiding white Irish youths.

 

 

  Notes from a Banana Republic

 

 

I’m feeling sick. The Boomtown Rats had a song called Banana Republic. Well, this may have been a back-handed reference to the little patch of green we call home. If so, it should be updated to Banana-skin Republic, and our top honchos have decidedly slipped on it.

 

Just look at them: Bertie the barrow-bow with his “mot” on the side, rather never on the side – out there, bold as brass (and just as trashy), on every junket, taking every freebie. Now most people know (and those who don’t should) that Bertie’s real first name is Bartholomew, but then the hypocoristic form of that is Bart, and we all know what that rhymes with. There is just something about him; he oozes… engine oil.I’ve met him twice, yet I feel that I’ve seen him far more often, perched on the corner of North Earl and Marlborough Streets, declaiming his wares to the world: ‘”Anywun else dare for tobacco?” He may rub shoulders with the world’s bigshots but he comes across like the defendant in a court-case who is accused of driving a vehicle with bald tyres the wrong way up a one-way street at 120 mph, with neither tax nor insurance, while under the influence of methylated spirits.

And then there’s the Taw nasty, Fatso Harney – where’s the bucket?! If she likes the yanks so much why doesn’t she go there, permanently? No one would miss her, apart from the handful of pricey Dublin restaurants in which she likes to eat in style. Put the two of them together – Barrow-boy and Fatso – and what would you get? Ireland’s very own version of Richard and Judy, that fatuous pair of talentless non-entities who labour under the misapprehension that they’re popular.

            Does my description of our deputy prime minister betoken sexism on my part? I Demur, for were she a man (and who knows, she may be) who is obese, and who chomps his way through expensive dinners while preaching to poor people often lacking the wherewithal to achieve a healthy, balanced diet that being destitute and hungry is good for them and that one day, far off in the future, they would realise it, I assure my readers that I would be far more unflattering in my epithets. The saving grace of the Progressive Democrats is their honesty: they believe sincerely in inequality. They also believe that it is good to steal – so long as the "thief" belongs to the Middle Classes. The others mouth hypocritical mantras about helping the country while they help themselves. They pursue policies which theoretically benefit everyone, but in practical terms only benefit themselves, their family members and their close friends.

And as for our local public representatives, stop the effin’ lights Bunny. County Councillors seemed to be scared shitless of their electorate – they should be, as they shit on them enough. I remember asking one particularly nauseous example some weeks before the last local election whether he was gearing up for the contest. “Oh no, I haven’t thought about that yet”. He should have; he nearly didn’t make it. No - they would prefer never to have to go crawling before the amorphous group known alternatively as “the hoors”, “the whingers”, “the Fuckers” and “the cunts”. (By the way, these names are not made up: some people in this neck of the woods might care to dwell on the fact that my family were heavily involved in local politics in the past. I well remember hearing a county councillor remarking, as he entered the count centre where his party colleagues were having a hard time getting elected: “The hoors don’t know when they’re well off”.) Instead of having to fulfill any public representative role, the vast majority would much prefer to cosy up to their buddies in the council executives and the building industry, feeding and drinking at the golden slop tank of local politics, and sharing the back-handers with their buddies.

 

The Minister for Changing Environments, Martin “I was once in the PDs” Cullen has unveiled the emasculated Local Government bill. This is like a piece of meat which has been bitten, gnawed and chewed by successive packs of wig-sporting Fight or Flight councillors. (In fairness, a similar fate would have befallen it at the paws of councillors from the Cheese and Wine Party.) As good democrats, they have given the thumbs down to directly-elected mayors. – jaysus the fuckers sayin’ who can wear the chain? – but the scandal whereby members of these councils could also be members of the national legislature has been ended. Cullen demonstrated admirably how this had been accepted; those giving up a council seat will receive compensation. What was it Neil Diamond used to sing “… money talks, but it can’t dance and it can’t walk.” It shure can puke though.

 

Now I believe that minister Cullen’s bill is a manifesto of political cowardice. I’m not saying that minister Cullen is a political coward: he’s from Waterford after all, and the bill has no doubt been drafted by the anonymous grey mandarins of his department. But if I had my way I’d get rid of county councillors altogether. I am a democrat, but generations of county councillors have demonstrated that they are a costly waste of space. They can’t sing (except when drunk), they can’t dance (except when in New York and drunk) and they look shaggin’ awful; have they gone a long way? The fact is that they are still around because they serve as a conduit of cronyism. The collective annals of county council meetings can be summed up in two words – talking shite. “I would like to take dis oppurchunity ta congrachalate Mickey Joe Rooney on havin’ a successful wank…”; “I’d like to join in the moshin o’ congrachalatin’ Mickey Joe; he’s been tryin’ to come off now for over thirty years, and like many o’ the ones there on the day, I thought it’d be touch ‘n go this time, but he’s demonstrated what our parish priest, Canon McNamara calls the power o’ persistence…’ This type of trivia is combined with words of praise and commendation for clerico-fascist front groups like the Vincent de Paul or the Pioneers..  the unbearable in full pursuit of the unspeakable, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde. Bin the bums! Ecrassez l’infame! as Voltaire wrote. The council executives could carry on very well…er they could carry on without them, spinning their artless ensemble of incompetence, arrogance and downright mendacity. Some of the more senior members of the executive might initially miss the cooling, calming, ego-enhancing tongues of the councillors on their rumps, but a good Jacuzzi would do the job just as well, and without the risk of infection. Apparently some of the double jobbing parliamentarians are worried that if they give up their council pews, they won;t have access to "relevant" information. Come off it - we know the type of information they're afraid of losing - Who's doin' Who Where. There are some local authority areas where the concept of "information" consists of The Mushroom Treatment - keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em shit.

 

What do you call a group of County Councillors in front of a firing squad? A start. I remember a Dublin comedian once describing an early-morning opening attended by public representatives by saying: “It was that cold the councillors had their hands in their own pockets.” Then there was the county councilor who was so crooked that when he accidentally swallowed a nail it came out of his arse as a corkscrew. The truth (like shit) will out, and it won’t smell too pretty..

 

The removal of county councillors would also aid me in pursuit of another piece of political engineering: the reform of the Irish senate. Our senators represent the very worst and the very best Irish society has to offer. Could this have something to do with the electoral system employed? Forty three are elected by – yes, county councillors. If they were gone, there would be no electorate. A puny six senators, the good ones, are chosen by graduates of Irish universities. As one of this electorate, I am very proud of the vote I can cast for the senators of Trinity College, Dublin. However, I am also embarrassed and angered that the number of Trinity senators is equal to the number of senators whom graduates of the National University can elect. This is manifestly unfair, and the disappearance of the forty-three seat losers and aspirant seat-stealers could be used to make more equitable amends. Furthermore, I can see no reason why those who are graduates of regional colleges of technology should not be given the same voting rights as university graduates.

            Reform of the Senate is long overdue, but it only surfaces as a topic of comment at each senate election. It belongs to the Irish political silly season, whose advent can be recognised not by rising thermometers but by torn, used election posters falling from lamp-posts and littering the gutters. The British tabloid press responded to the Silly Season by printing the story about Red Ken’s vasectomy.

            As citizens we should be more audacious in pursuing our rights and pursuing those who claim to be our representatives. As Danton proclaimed: “De l’audace, encore de l’audace et toujours de l’audace!!” – pity he lost his head.

 

Less Freedom of Information

 

The minister for creative accounting, Charlie McCreepy, has announced further restrictions on the workings of the Freedom of information Act. People will now have to pay big bucks to find out whether they're being fucked by their government. Now these moves are the result of fear. McCreepy's "justification" is ludicrous: "Things that are free are abused". This is the justification used by innumerable members of the world's oldest profession. Ask any prostitute why she left her husband and the reply will be. "When I offered my man sex for free he just abused and took advantage of me. With the game I'm in control: it's a contract."

 

  

 

More Commentary     Home